Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2015

Curtis v. Hobbs

Curtis v. Hobbs
Supreme Court of Arkansas · Decided March 19, 2015 · Per Curiam
2015 Ark. 127
Curtis v. Hobbs

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. 127

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CV-14-1098

DEMETRIUS CURTIS Opinion Delivered March 19, 2015 APPELLANT

PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF V. CERTIORARI AND MOTION TO FILE A BELATED BRIEF [CHICOT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS NO. 09CV-14-72] DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

APPELLEE HONORABLE ROBERT BYNUM GIBSON, JUDGE APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION AND PETITION MOOT.

PER CURIAM

On October 15, 2014, appellant Demetrius Curtis filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Chicot County Circuit Court where he was incarcerated. The circuit court denied the petition, and appellant lodged an appeal from the order in this court. Now before us are appellant’s petition for writ of certiorari and motion to file a belated brief.

Because the public records of the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) reflect that appellant is no longer incarcerated, it is clear that he could not prevail on appeal were we to permit the appeal to proceed. A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of habeas corpus a prisoner not in custody. Branning v. Harmon, 2009 Ark. 533 (per curiam). Accordingly, we find that the motion and petition are moot. Thus, we do not reach the merits of the motion and petition and dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed; motion and petition moot.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.