Scott v. State
Scott v. State
Opinion of the Court
COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Associate Justice *280Pursuant to the state Freedom of Information Act, petitioner Ricky Lee Scott brings this pro se motion seeking a copy at public expense of certain written material on file with this court. In 1998, a jury found Scott guilty of murder in the first degree and sentenced him to life imprisonment. We affirmed. Scott v. State ,
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), codified as Arkansas Code Annotated sections 25-19-101 to -111 (Supp. 2017), does not require a court to provide photocopies at public expense. Likewise, indigency alone does not entitle a petitioner to photocopies at public expense. See Geatches v. State ,
To be entitled to copies at public expense, a petitioner must demonstrate a compelling need for the copies as documentary evidence to support an allegation contained in a timely petition for postconviction relief. Moore v. State,
It should be noted that when material has been placed on file with either this court or the court of appeals, the material remains permanently on file with the clerk. Persons may review the material in the clerk's office and photocopy all or portions of it. An incarcerated person desiring a photocopy of material on file with the clerk may write this court, remit the photocopying fee, and request that the copy be mailed to the prison.
Motion denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ricky Lee SCOTT v. STATE of Arkansas
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published