In RE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON CIVIL PRACTICE - RECOMMENDATIONS TO AMEND RULE 4(f)(4) OF THE ARKANSAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Cite as 2026 Ark. 105 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE ARKANSAS SUPREME Opinion Delivered: June 4, 2026 COURT COMMITTEE ON CIVIL PRACTICE – RECOMMENDATIONS TO AMEND RULE 4(F)(4) OF THE ARKANSAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PER CURIAM The Arkansas Supreme Court’s Committee on Civil Practice submitted the following for changes to Rule 4(f)(4) of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. See In re Ark. Sup. Ct. Comm. on Civ. Prac. – Recommendations to Amend Rule 4(f)(4) of the Ark. Rules of Civ. P., 2026 Ark. 19 (per curiam). It was published for comment, and we now adopt the change, effective as of the date of this per curiam. The adopted amendments are shown in “line-in, line-out” form.

We thank the Committee members for their work on this project.

Rule 4. Summons and Service of Process. **** (f) Personal Service Inside the State. Service of process shall be made inside the state as follows: **** (4) Incarcerated Persons. Service on a person incarcerated in any jail, penitentiary, or other correctional facility in this state shall be on the administrator of the institution, the person in charge of the jail, penitentiary, or other correctional facility at the time of service, or the on-site agent, secretary, or assistant of the administrator or the person in charge of the jail, penitentiary, or other correctional facility at the time of service, who shall promptly deliver the process to the incarcerated person. A copy of the process shall also be sent to the incarcerated person by first-class mail and marked as “legal mail” and, unless the court otherwise directs to his or her spouse, if any. *. * * * Addition to Reporter’s Notes, 2026 Amendment. Service upon inmates by service on the “administrator” of a jail or correctional facility has proven to be problematic as a practical matter. Locating the administrator and serving that person is often impractical. This amendment addresses those difficulties. It provides for service on “the person in charge” if the actual administrator is away at the time service is attempted, relying on the notion that someone must always be left in charge. It also allows for service upon “the agent, secretary, or assistant” of the administrator or the person in charge. This language is borrowed directly from the provisions of Rule 4 addressing service on corporations and limited liability companies where it has worked well. See Ark. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(5) & (6).

WEBB, J., not participating.