Scanlan v. Reed
Scanlan v. Reed
Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
This is a request for review of an order of the Chief Election Officer. It seeks the removal
Appellate Court Rule 15 allows the respondents twenty days in which to file a response. The petition does not request an expedited hearing or a stay of the Election Officer’s order pending judicial review. Even if such a request had been made, there would appear to be insufficient time in which to allow respondents a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations in the petition.
Accordingly, the matter will not be set for hearing prior to the election. It is unnecessary at this time to express an opinion about whether and under what circumstances the controversy may be ripe for adjudication after the election.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.