State v. Bartley

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v.

ANTHONY JAMES BARTLEY, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 14-0648 PRPC

FILED 11-10-2016

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Yavapai County No. P1300CR20080506

P1300CR20081074

The Honorable Celé Hancock, Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Yavapai County Attorney’s Office, Prescott

By Michael P. McGill

Counsel for Respondent

Craig Williams, Attorney at Law, P.L.L.C., Prescott Valley By Craig Williams

Counsel for Petitioner STATE v. BARTLEY

Decision of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop delivered the decision of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Kent E. Cattani and Chief Judge Michael J. Brown joined.

W I N T H R O P, Judge:

¶1 Petitioner, Anthony James Bartley, petitions this court for review of the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief of-right. The sole issue Bartley presents for review is whether the trial court erred when it ordered Bartley to serve two prison sentences consecutively as a result of his convictions—and subsequent probation violations—in Yavapai County case no. P1300CR20080506. We deny relief because the issue is moot. Bartley has been absolutely discharged from those two sentences and is no longer in prison, nor is he exposed to further imprisonment for those two convictions.

¶2 Accordingly, we grant review, but deny relief.

AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court FILED: AA