NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. KRISTA MARIE CLINE, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 24-0509 PRPC FILED 02-13-2025

Appeal from the Superior Court in Yavapai County No. V1300CR201880022 The Honorable Michael R. Bluff, Judge AFFIRMED

COUNSEL Yavapai County Attorney’s Office, Prescott By Glen M. Asay Counsel for Respondent Krista Marie Cline, Goodyear Petitioner STATE v. CLINE Decision of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Brian Y. Furuya, Chief Judge David B. Gass, and Vice Chief Judge Randall M. Howe delivered the decision of the court.

PER CURIAM: ¶1 Petitioner Krista Marie Cline seeks review of the superior court’s order denying her petition for post-conviction relief. This is petitioner’s first petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, This Court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577 ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, the petition for review, and the State’s notice of acknowledgment of petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.

AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court FILED: TM