NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. DANIEL RAE WILSON, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 24-0182 PRPC FILED 05-15-2025 Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County No. CR-2020-01339 The Honorable Richard D. Lambert, Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Mohave County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix By Matthew J. Smith Counsel for Respondent Daniel Rae Wilson, Eloy Petitioner Pro Se STATE v. WILSON Decision of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Anni Hill Foster, Judge Michael J. Brown, and Judge Paul J. McMurdie delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM: ¶1 Petitioner Daniel Rae Wilson seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is Wilson’s first petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is Petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.

MATTHEW J. MARTIN • Clerk of the Court FILED: JR