NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. LEONARD JOSEPH VALENTINE, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 24-0553 PRPC FILED 05-15-2025

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR2012-006283-001 The Honorable Bruce R. Cohen, Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix By Faith Cheree Klepper Counsel for Respondent Leonard Joseph Valentine, Buckeye Petitioner Pro Se STATE v. VALENTINE Decision of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Anni Hill Foster, Judge Michael J. Brown, and Judge Paul J. McMurdie delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM: ¶1 Petitioner Leonard Joseph Valentine seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is Valentine’s second petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is Petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition for review, response, and reply. We find that Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.

MATTHEW J. MARTIN • Clerk of the Court FILED: JR