State v. Struebing

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. CHARLES STRUEBING, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 25-0265 PRPC FILED 02-11-2026 Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County Nos. CR2009-048714-001, CR2009-122465-001 The Honorable Geoffrey H. Fish, Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Charles Struebing, Buckeye, Petitioner Petitioner STATE v. STRUEBING Decision of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Michael S. Catlett, Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, and Judge Angela K. Paton delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM: ¶1 Petitioner Charles Struebing seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 33.1. This is Struebing’s third successive petition.

¶2 We will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief absent an abuse of discretion or legal error. See State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). Struebing has the burden to show that the superior court erred in denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition for review. The petitioner has not established error.

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.

MATTHEW J. MARTIN • Clerk of the Court FILED: JR