United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2019

Daniel v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Daniel v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided August 21, 2019
Daniel v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

1 WO 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Armando Daniel, No. CV-15-0452-TUC-BGM 10 Plaintiff, v. ORDER Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

15 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 27). Defendant does not object to the fees requested. See Def.’s Response to Pl.’s Mot. for Attorney Fees (Doc. 33). Having reviewed the same, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 27) is GRANTED.

20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded attorney’s fees of $7,714.84 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

22 EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 595–98, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528–29, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010). As such, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, after receiving this Order, the Commissioner determines upon its effectuation that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, Blair Ariel Feldman. If, however, there is a debt owed that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check || made out to Plaintiff, but delivered to Plaintiffs attorney, Blair Ariel Feldman.

3 Dated this 20th day of August, 2019. : Co Peru 5 Honorable Bruce G. Macdonald 6 United States Magistrate Judge -2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.