Granados v. Arizona, State of

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Crispin Granados, No. CV-15-00492-TUC-RCC 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. State of Arizona, et al., 13 Respondents.

15 On August 6, 2019, Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in which he recommended this Court dismiss Petitioner, Crispin Granados’, Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Doc. 110. In the R&R, Judge Markovich notified the parties that they had fourteen (14) days from the date of the R&R to file any objections. No objections have been filed.

20 Where neither party objects to the magistrate judge’s R&R, this Court is not required to review the magistrate judge’s decision under any specified standard of review.

22 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). However, the statute for review of a magistrate judge’s recommendation “does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte, or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard.” Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154.

26 The Court has reviewed and considered the Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 110), the State of Arizona’s Response (Doc. 119), the additional attachments (Doc. 120), and Judge Markovich’s R&R (Doc. 133). The Court finds the R&R well- || reasoned and agrees with Judge Markovich’s conclusions. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY || ORDERED that the R&R is ADOPTED. Petitioner’s Amended Petition for a Writ of 3|| Habeas Corpus (Doc. 110) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall docket 4|| accordingly and close the case file in this matter.

5 Dated this 11th day of September, 2019.

7 4] 8 Lb pL tK~ Cub ? Honorable Raner ©. Collins 10 senior United States District Judge _2-