Primitivo v. Ryan

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Carlos Primitivo, No. CV-18-04595-PHX-ROS 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. Charles L Ryan, et al., 13 Respondents.

15 On July 22, 2019, Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as untimely. Petitioner did not file any objections to the R&R. Therefore, the R&R will be adopted in full. See Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. 19 Ariz. 2003) (“[D]istrict courts are not required to conduct any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”).

21 Accordingly, 22 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED IN FULL. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal with prejudice.

25 … … … … 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED because 2|| dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would || not find the procedural ruling debatable.

4 Dated this 23rd day of September, 2019.

5 fo .

6 —— . g Senior United States District Judge _2-