United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2019

Fitzgerald v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Fitzgerald v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided December 5, 2019
Fitzgerald v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

WO 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Richard Willfred Fitzgerald, ) No. CIV 18-524-TUC-LAB 8 ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER 9 ) Vs. ) 10 ) Commissioner of Social Security) | Administration, ) ) 12 Defendant. ) ) 13 ) 14 Pending before the court is a joint stipulation for Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) || fees, filed on December 4, 2019. (Doc. 39) Good cause appearing, 16 It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for EAJA Fees is GRANTED and || Plaintiff is awarded $9,500.00 in attorney’s fees. (Doc. 39) If it is determined upon || effectuation of the Court’s EAJA fee order that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to || offset under the Treasury Offset Program (Astrue v Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010)), Defendant || agrees to accept the assignment, and fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, Karl E.

21 |] Osterhout, Esquire, 521 Cedar Way, Suite 200, Oakmont, Pennsylvania 15139. If there is such || a debt, any fee remaining after the offset will be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff’ s || attorney, Karl E. Osterhout, Esquire, 521 Cedar Way, Suite 200, Oakmont, Pennsylvania 15139.

24 DATED this 4" day of December, 2019.

27 als QO. Bowman Leslie A. Bowman 28 United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.