More v. Arizona Department of Corrections

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Michael More, No. CV19-4530 PHX DGC Plaintiff, ORDER vs. Arizona Department of Corrections, et al., 13 Defendants.

15 Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file and serve his lodged proposed Third Amended Complaint. Doc. 21. United States Magistrate Camille D. Bibles has issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the motion be denied. Doc. 27.

18 No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the motion.

22 IT IS ORDERED: 23 1. The R&R (Doc.27) is accepted.

24 2. The motion to file and serve the proposed Third Amended Complaint 25 (Doc. 21) is denied.

1 3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on 2 appeal are denied.

3 Dated this 10th day of January, 2020.

5 .

Saul 6 Couple 7 David. Campbell 8 Senior United States District Judge _2-