United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2020

Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided February 3, 2020
Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

1 WO 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Rebecca Ruiz, No. CV-18-0292-TUC-BGM 10 Plaintiff, v. ORDER Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

15 Currently pending before the Court is the Parties’ Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 26 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Doc.

17 24). Having reviewed the same, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties’ motion (Doc. 24) is GRANTED.

19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded attorney’s fees of $1,847.55 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

21 EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 595–98, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528–29, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010). As such, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, after receiving this Order, the Commissioner determines upon its effectuation that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney. If, however, there is a debt owed that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but □□ delivered to Plaintiff's attorney. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiffs || counsel at the following address: Hallinan & Killpack Law Firm, 5240 East Pima Street, Tucson, Arizona 85712.

4 Dated this 31st day of January, 2020. ° See PD Pe 6 Honorable Bruce G. Macdonald United States Magistrate Judge _2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.