United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2020

Wallace v. Shinn

Wallace v. Shinn
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided November 24, 2020
Wallace v. Shinn

Trial Court Opinion

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Robert C Wallace, No. CV-20-08095-PCT-DWL 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. David Shinn, et al., 13 Respondents.

15 Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 13). The R&R, which was issued on October 29, 2020, recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice and further provides that “[t]he parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court.” (Doc.

21 13 at 9.)

22 Here, no such objections have been filed. Thus, the Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. See, e.g., Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) 1|| (‘[T]he district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 2|| de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.”).

3 Accordingly, 4 IT IS ORDERED that the R&R’s recommended disposition (Doc. 13) is accepted, || that the Petition (Doc. 1) is dismissed with prejudice, and that the Clerk of Court shall □□ enter judgment accordingly.

7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability and leave to || proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be denied because dismissal of the Petition is justified 9|| by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable.

11 Dated this 24th day of November, 2020.

13 Lm ee” 14 f t _o——— Dominic W, Lanza 15 United States District Judge -2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.