Jackson-Bey v. Von Blanckensee

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey, No. CV-20-00095-TUC-RCC (LAB) 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. Barbara Von Blanckensee, 13 Respondent.

15 On September 1, 2020, Magistrate Judge Leslie A. Bowman issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in which he recommended the Court dismiss Petitioner Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 18 2241. (Doc. 21.) The R&R notified the parties they had fourteen (14) days from the date of the R&R to file any objections. (Id.) Petitioner was warned that “[i]f objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived.” (Id. at 5.) Petitioner filed a motion to continue, and the Court allowed Petitioner until November 18, 2020 to file an objection to the R&R. It is now November 27, 2020 and no objections have been filed.

23 If neither party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the District Court is not required to review the magistrate judge’s decision under any specified standard of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). However, the statute for review of a magistrate judge’s recommendation “does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard.” Id. at 154.

1 The Court has reviewed and considered the Petition (Doc. 1), the Government’s 2|| response (Doc. 15), Petitioner’s reply (Doc. 20), and the R&R (Doc. 21). The Court finds 3|| the R&R well-reasoned and agrees with Judge Bowman’s conclusions.

4 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the R&R is ADOPTED (Doc. 21) and Petitioner || Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § || 2241 (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall docket accordingly and close the case file in this matter.

8 Dated this 27th day of November, 2020.

11 fl Dp 12 ( f Honorable Raner C. Collins 13 senior United States District Judge _2-