United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2021

Membrilla v. Napier

Membrilla v. Napier
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided April 12, 2021
Membrilla v. Napier

Trial Court Opinion

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Richard A Membrilla, No. CV-19-00606-TUC-RCC 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. Mark Napier, et al., 13 Respondents. b On December 31, 2019, Petitioner Richard A. Membrilla filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (“Petition”). (Doc. 1). The Petition was fully briefed November 10, 2020. (Doc. 18). Thereafter, Magistrate Judge Leslie Bowman issued and Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this Court dismiss Petitioner’s claims as time-barred or, in the alternative, as non-cognizable claims. (Doc.

19). The R&R notified the parties they had fourteen (14) days from the date of the R&R to file any objections. No objections have been filed.

If neither party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the District Court is not required to review the magistrate judge’s decision under any specified standard of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). However, the statute for review of a magistrate judge’s recommendation “does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard.” Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154.

This Court reviewed and considered the Petition (Doc. 1), Judge Bowman’s R&R (Doc. 19). The Court finds the R&R well-reasoned and agrees with Magistrate Judge Bowman’s conclusions.

2|| Certificate of Appealability 3 In this matter, Petitioner failed to file any objections to the R&R. The Court finds 4|| that jurists of reason would not find it debatable that Petitioner’s claims were time-barred. || Therefore, this Court shall not issue a Certificate of Appealability. Any further request 6|| for a Certificate of Appealability must be addressed to the Court of Appeals. See 7\| Fed.R.App.P. 22(b); Ninth Circuit R. 22-1.

8 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the R&R (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED and Plaintiff's Petition is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED this Court SHALL 10/1 NOT issue a Certificate of Appealability for this matter. The Clerk of Court shall docket I! accordingly and close the case file in this matter.

Dated this 12th day of April, 2021.

15 Dp AK Honorable Raner ©. Collins 17 sernior United States District Judge _2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.