Davis v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Trial Court Opinion
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9 David Edward Davis, No. CV-20-00942-PHX-SMB (CDB) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 Vv. □□ Unknown Overton, et al., 13 Defendants.
15 United States Magistrate Camille D. Bibles has issued a report and recommendation 16|| (R&R) recommending that Detention Officers 2, 3, and 4 be dismissed without prejudice 17|| for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court’s order at ECF No. 5. (Doc. 32). No || objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 19|} 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3);Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); || United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, the || Court has reviewed the court’s docket along with the R&R and agrees with the analysis of || Magistrate Judge Bibles. The Court will accept and adopts the R&R. 23 IT IS ORDERED dismissing Defendants Detention Officers 2, 3, and 4 without || prejudice.
5 Dated this 20th day of May, 2021.
27 “Ss ?
SO fonorable Susan M. Brnovich = United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.