Cardenas v. Arizona, State of

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Laisdel Vieras Cardenas, No. CV20-00903 PHX DGC (CDB) Petitioner, ORDER vs. State of Arizona, et al., 13 Respondents.

15 Petitioner Laisdel Vieras Cardenas has filed a third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 12. United States Magistrate Camille D. Bibles has issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 18. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R, deny, and dismiss the petition with prejudice.

23 IT IS ORDERED: 24 1. The R&R (Doc. 18) is accepted.

25 2. The third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 12) is denied 26 and dismissed with prejudice.

27 3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on 28 appeal are denied 1 4. The Clerk is directed enter judgment and terminate this action.

2 Dated this Ist day of June, 2021.

3 .

David G. Campbeil 6 Senior United States District Judge _2-