Sanchez v. Barr
Trial Court Opinion
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 Miguel Angel Reyes Sanchez, No. CV-20-00936-PHX-MTL 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. William Barr, et al., 13 Respondents.
15 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (R & R) (Doc. 13) recommending that Petitioner Miguel Angel Reyes Sanchez’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) be dismissed as moot. Neither party has filed objections to the R & R. 19 Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the R & R. The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). “[T]he district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); see Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts need not conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”).
26 Based on the foregoing, 27 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is accepted.
28 /// 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Miguel Angel Reyes Sanchez’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is dismissed as moot.
3 IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case.
4 Dated this 17th day of June, 2021. ° Wichal T. Hburde Michael T. Liburdi 8 United States District Judge _2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.