McDowell v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Garrick Roy McDowell, No. CV-19-05102-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. Unknown Party, 13 Defendant.

16 United States Magistrate Eileen S. Willett has issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Second Amended Complaint dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s Order and prosecute pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 41(b). (Doc. 27). The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 7-8) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3);Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 23 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

24 Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with the analysis of Magistrate Willett. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R. 26 IT IS ORDERED: 27 (1) Accepting and adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 27); 1 (2) Dismissing this action without prejudice and directing the Clerk of Court to || terminate this action.

3 Dated this 8th day of October, 2021.

5 — ose 7 onorable Susan M, Brnovich 3 United States District Judge _2-