McDowell v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Garrick Roy McDowell, No. CV-19-05102-PHX-SMB

Plaintiff, ORDER v.

Unknown Party,

Defendant.

United States Magistrate Eileen S. Willett has issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Second Amended Complaint dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s Order and prosecute pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 41(b). (Doc. 27). The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 7-8) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3);Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 23 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with the analysis of Magistrate Willett. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R. IT IS ORDERED: (1) Accepting and adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 27); (2) Dismissing this action without prejudice and directing the Clerk of Court to || terminate this action.

Dated this 8th day of October, 2021.

— ose onorable Susan M, Brnovich

United States District Judge

_2-