United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2021

Miller v. Owens

Miller v. Owens
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided October 20, 2021
Miller v. Owens

Trial Court Opinion

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Cindy Miller, No. CV-21-08167-PCT-DMF 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. Blake Owens, et al., 13 Defendants.

15 This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine for a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 4.) On October 4, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation with this Court. (Doc. 13.) After the filing of the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff filed two motions to add exhibits to her First Amended Complaint. (Docs. 14, 15.) However, to date, no objections have been filed.

20 STANDARD OF REVIEW 21 The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have fourteen days from the service of a copy of the Magistrate’s recommendation within which to file specific written objections to the Court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on appeal. See Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a Magistrate Judge’s conclusion “is a factor to be weighed in considering the || propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal.” Id. 3 DISCUSSION 4 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no || Objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and || adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

7 CONCLUSION 8 Accordingly, for the reasons set forth, 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the □□ Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 13.)

11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's First || Amended Complaint. (Doc. 11.)

13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiff's motion to add 14|| exhibits. (Docs. 14-15.)

15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to close this matter.

16 Dated this 20th day of October, 2021.

18 — Lil nora Hdhorable Stephen M. McNamee 19 Senior United States District Judge _2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.