United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2021

Petculescu v. Harry and David LLC

Petculescu v. Harry and David LLC
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided November 1, 2021
Petculescu v. Harry and David LLC

Trial Court Opinion

1 WO 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Elizabeth M Petculescu, No. CV-21-01596-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. Harry and David LLC, 13 Defendant.

15 Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. As a result, federal courts can hear only those cases that the Constitution and Congress have authorized them to adjudicate; namely, cases involving diversity of citizenship, a federal question, or cases to which the United States is a party. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). The party asserting jurisdiction bears the burden of proving jurisdiction. Id. “Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal judge’s first duty in every case.”

21 Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C., 350 F.3d 691, 693 (7th Cir. 2003).

23 In this case, because Plaintiff filed her suit in federal district court, she must show that the federal court is authorized to hear her case. Plaintiff alleges jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. However, the complaint fails to sufficiently plead diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332; Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, L.P., 437 27 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006) (discussing the citizenship of a limited liability company). To properly plead diversity jurisdiction, a complaint must list the citizenship of every member || of any party that is a limited partnership or limited liability company. NewGen, LLC v. 2\| Safe Cig, LLC, 840 F.3d 606, 611 (9th Cir. 2016). Here, Plaintiff states that Defendant is || a limited liability company, but lists a state of “incorporation” which would be applicable 4|| only to corporations.

5 Thus, Plaintiff will be required to supplement her complaint to properly allege 6|| federal subject matter jurisdiction. If Plaintiff fails to file the required supplement, or if 7\|| Plaintiff files a supplement that fails to plead sufficient facts to establish federal subject || matter jurisdiction, this case will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.

9 Based on the foregoing, 10 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must file the supplement required herein by November 30, 2021.

12 Dated this 1st day of November, 2021.

14 A 16 _ James A. Teil Org Senior United States District Judge _2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.