Harry v. Arizona, State of

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Lewis A Harry, Jr., No. CV-19-02234-PHX-DLR (JFM) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. State of Arizona, et al., 13 Defendants.

16 Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court dismiss this action with prejudice. (Doc. 87.) Neither party objected, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (failing to timely object to an R&R waives review of that R&R). Still, the Court reviewed the R&R and finds it well-taken. The Court accepts the R&R in its entirety. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

24 IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 87) is ACCEPTED.

25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the reference of this case to the Magistrate Judge is WITHDRAWN, and this action shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

27 / / / / / / 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment || accordingly and terminate this case.

3 Dated this 12th day of November, 2021. : Apues le 8 States Dictric Judge _2-