United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2022

McReynolds v. United States

McReynolds v. United States
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided February 11, 2022
McReynolds v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Loren Joel McReynolds, No. CV-21-08001-PCT-DGC 9 CR-18-08052-01-PCT-DGC Petitioner, 10 ORDER v. United States of America, 13 Respondent.

14 Pending before the Court is a § 2255 motion (Doc. 1) and amended motion (Doc.

15 8) filed by Petitioner Loren Joel McReynolds. Respondent has filed a response (Doc.

16 12), and Petitioner has filed a reply. Doc. 14. United States Magistrate Judge James F.

17 Metcalf has issued a report and recommendation that the motion be dismissed with prejudice and that a certificate of appealability be denied (R&R). Doc. 15. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

IT IS ORDERED: 1. The R&R (Doc.15) is accepted.

2. The 2225 motion (Doc. 8) is denied and dismissed with prejudice.

3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied. / / / / / / 1 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and terminate 2 this action.

3 Dated this 11th day of February, 2022.

Ds aul 6 gud © Cau phtl 7 DavidG. Campbell g Senior United States District Judge -2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.