Goff 186716 v. Rode

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Shawn Charles Goff, No. CV-20-01284-PHX-DLR (JFM) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. Unknown Rode, et al., 13 Defendants.

15 Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court dismiss Defendant Castro- Hermosillo without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to serve Defendant Castro-Hermosillo pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 88.) The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (failing to timely object to an R&R waives review of that R&R).

23 Neither party filed objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. Still, the Court reviewed the R&R and finds it well-taken. The Court accepts the R&R in its entirety. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

1 IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 88) is ACCEPTED.

2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Castro-Hermosillo is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

4 Dated this 9th day of March, 2022. (Log tha 9 Upied States Dictria Judge _2-