United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2022

Ugalde v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Ugalde v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided September 21, 2022
Ugalde v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

1 WO 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Raquel Nancy Ugalde, No. CV-21-00312-TUC-RM (LAB) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

15 On August 15, 2022, Magistrate Judge Leslie A. Bowman issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) recommending that this Court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed.

19 A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a magistrate judge’s “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The advisory committee’s notes to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, “[w]hen no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation” of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition. See also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 26 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.”); Prior v. Ryan, CV 10-225-TUC-RCC, 2012 WL 1344286, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 18, 2012) (reviewing for || clear error unobjected-to portions of Report and Recommendation).

2 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation, the parties’ briefs, and the record. The Court finds no error in Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, 5 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is accepted || and adopted in full.

7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner of || Social Security is affirmed. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of || the Commissioner and close this case.

10 Dated this 20th day of September, 2022.

12 ff 3 eh Lien) 14 ANGULAyf Honorable Rostsiary □□□□□□□ 15 United States District □□□□□ _2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.