United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2022

Pinson v. Blanckensee

Pinson v. Blanckensee
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided September 26, 2022
Pinson v. Blanckensee

Trial Court Opinion

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Jeremy Pinson, No. CV-19-00421-TUC-RM 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. Barbara Blanckensee, 13 Respondent.

15 On August 16, 2022, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Rateau issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) recommending that this Court deny Petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed and the time for doing so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. 19 P. 72(b)(2).

20 A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a magistrate judge’s “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The advisory committee’s notes to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, “[w]hen no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation” of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition. See also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 27 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.”); Prior v. Ryan, |} CV 10-225-TUC-RCC, 2012 WL 1344286, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 18, 2012) (reviewing for 2|| clear error unobjected-to portions of Report and Recommendation).

3 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation, the parties’ briefs, and the record. The Court finds no error in Magistrate Judge Rateau’s || Report and Recommendation.

6 Accordingly, 7 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is accepted || and adopted in full.

9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ || of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment || accordingly and close this case.

12 Dated this 23rd day of September, 20272. i piles □□ 16 ANGUL Bf Honorable Rostsiary □□□□□□□ 17 United States District □□□□□ _2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.