United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2022

Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated

Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided December 14, 2022
Ascension Arizona v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Incorporated

Trial Court Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA | Ascension Arizona dba Carondelet St.) No. CV 21-434-TUC-JAS (BGM) Joseph’s Hospital, ) 5 ) ORDER Plaintiff, ) 6 ) vs. ) 7 ) || Amerisure Insurance Company, et al.

9 Defendants.

1] Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States || Magistrate Judge Macdonald. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed || any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired.

14 |] As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

15 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s || recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; || Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 || F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s || Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) 1s accepted and adopted; (2) The motion to remand || (Doc. 27) is denied.

22 Dated this 14th day of December, 2022.

25 ark, 26 Honorable James A. Soto 7 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.