Becerra v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Dorothy Becerra, No. CV-22-00045-TUC-SHR 10 Plaintiff, Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

16 On April 12, 2023, Magistrate Judge Lynnette C. Kimmins issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending the Court remand the matter to the ALJ for a new hearing and further proceedings. (Doc. 27.) The Magistrate Judge informed the parties they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and an additional fourteen days to respond. (Id. at 11.) No objections have been filed and neither party has requested additional time to do so. 22 If neither party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the District Court is not required to review the magistrate judge’s decision under any specified standard of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (district court only needs to review magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made). However, the statute for review of a magistrate judge’s recommendation “does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any | other standard.” Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154.

2 In this case, the deadline for filing objections was on May 1, 2023. As noted, no objections have been filed, and neither party has requested additional time to do so. Consequently, the Court may adopt the R&R on that basis alone. See Schmidt v. Johnstone, || 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (district court declined to review the magistrate || judge’s report because no objections were filed). The Court finds the R&R well-reasoned || and agrees with Judge Kimmins’ conclusions. Accordingly, 8 IT IS ORDERED Magistrate Judge Lynnette C. Kimmins' Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (Doc. 27.)

10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED this case is REMANDED to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings consistent with this Order and the R&R. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment 13 accordingly and close the file in this case.

14 Dated this 3rd day of May, 2023.

16 ; 18 Honorable Scott H. Rash 19 _/ United States District Judge _2-