Halterman 289633 v. Thornell

1 MDR WO 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Jerad Lee Halterman, No. CV-23-08615-PCT-JAT (ASB) 10 Petitioner, v. ORDER Ryan F. Thornell, et al., 13 Respondents.

15 Pro se Petitioner Jerad Lee Halterman, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison Complex-Eyman, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2). The Court will grant the Application to Proceed and will require an answer to the Petition.

19 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 20 Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis indicates that his inmate trust account balance is less than $25.00. Accordingly, the Court will grant Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See LRCiv 3.5(c).

23 II. Petition 24 Petitioner was convicted in Yavapai County Superior Court, case #CR201900780, of two counts of sexual conduct with a minor and one count each of luring a minor for sexual exploitation, aggravated luring a minor, and sexual conduct with a minor under the age of 15. He was sentenced to a combination of concurrent and consecutive terms of imprisonment totaling 42 years.

1 In his Petition, Petitioner names Ryan F. Thornell as Respondent and the Arizona Attorney General as an Additional Respondent. Petitioner raises six grounds for relief: (1) his confession, which was coerced, was introduced at trial, in 4 violation of the prohibition against self-incrimination; 5 (2) he was denied his right to “representation by a competent lawyer at every critical stage of the proceedings”; 7 (3) the State used perjured testimony; 8 (4) he was subjected to judicial and prosecutorial misconduct and, therefore his trial was unfair and not impartial; 10 (5) his sentence was not in accordance with “the sentencing procedures established by rule and statute”; and (6) the State unconstitutionally suppressed evidence.

13 Petitioner contends he presented these issues to the Arizona Court of Appeals and Arizona Supreme Court. The Court will require Respondents to answer the Petition. 28 15 U.S.C. § 2254(a).

16 III. Warnings 17 A. Address Changes 18 Petitioner must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action.

22 B. Copies 23 Because Petitioner is currently confined in an Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry unit subject to General Order 14-17, Petitioner is not required to serve Respondents with a copy of every document he files or to submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court, as would ordinarily be required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5.4. Petitioner may comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(d) by including, with every document he files, a certificate of service stating that this case is subject to General Order 14-17 and indicating the date the document was delivered to prison officials for filing with the Court.

3 If Petitioner is transferred to a unit other than one subject to General Order 14-17, he will be required to: (a) serve Respondents, or counsel if an appearance has been entered, a copy of every document that he files, and include a certificate stating that a copy of the filing was served; and (b) submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court.

7 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a) and (d); LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice to Petitioner.

9 C. Possible Dismissal 10 If Petitioner fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the Court).

14 IT IS ORDERED: 15 (1) Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.

16 (2) The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1) and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the Arizona Attorney General’s Office. Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding, copies of the Petition and this Order will be sent via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) to the State of Arizona Respondent through the Attorney General for the State of Arizona to designated electronic mail addresses. Within 2 business days, the Attorney General’s Office will acknowledge receipt of the Petition and the Court’s Order and within 5 business days will either file a notice of appearance on behalf of Respondents or will notify the Court of the names of the Respondents on whose behalf the Arizona Attorney General’s Office will not accept service of process.

1 (3) Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service.

2 Respondents must not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer. Respondents may file an answer that (a) is limited to relevant affirmative defenses, including, but not limited to, statute of limitations, procedural bar, or non-retroactivity; (b) raises affirmative defenses as to some claims and discusses the merits of others; or (c) discusses the merits of all claims. The failure to set forth an affirmative defense regarding a claim in an answer may be treated as a waiver of the defense as to that claim, Day v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 8 198, 209-11 (2006), but an answer that is limited to affirmative defenses on a particular claim does not waive any argument on the merits as to that claim. If the answer only raises affirmative defenses, only those portions of the record relevant to those defenses need be attached to the answer. If not, the answer must fully comply with all of the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.

13 (4) Regarding courtesy copies of documents for chambers, Respondents are directed to review Section II(D) of the Court’s Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, which requires that “a courtesy copy of the filing, referencing the specific document number, shall be printed directly from CM/ECF.”

17 CM/ECF Admin. Man. § II(D)(3) (emphasis added). See http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/ sites/default/files/documents/adm%20manual.pdf.

19 (5) Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer.

21 . . . .

22 . . . .

23 . . . .

24 . . . .

25 . . . .

26 . . . .

27 . . . .

28 . . . .

1 (6) This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Alison S. Bachus pursuant to 2| Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation.

4 Dated this 6th day of December, 2023.

6 ' g = James A. C rg Senior United States District Judge