Shear v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Thomas Shear, No. CV-23-00871-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

15 United States Magistrate Judge Eiileen Willett has issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 18) recommending that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 13) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with the analysis of Magistrate Judge Willett. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R. 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docs. 18) is accepted.

26 … 27 … 28 … 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED affirming the decision of the Commissioner of 2|| Social Security and dismissing this case. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter || judgment accordingly and terminate this case.

4 Dated this 29th day of May, 2024.

6 “Ss > fonorable Susan M. Brnovich = 8 United States District Judge -2-