United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2024

Ain v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Ain v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided October 18, 2024
Ain v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Sara Elise Ain, No. CV-24-00008-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

15 Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Willett’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 23). The R&R recommends that the Court reverse the Administrative Law Judge’s April 4, 2023 decision (A.R. 21-42), as upheld by the Appeals Council (A.R. 1-7), and remand this case to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 22 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Neither party filed objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . .

25 of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The Court will accept the R&R in its entirety. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) || (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 2|| findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”).

5 IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 23) is ACCEPTED.

6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the reference of this case to the Magistrate 7\| Judge is WITHDRAWN, and the Administrative Law Judge’s decision is REVERSED.

8 || This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings.

9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment || accordingly and terminate this case.

11 Dated this 18th day of October, 2024.

14 {Z, 16 Son United States District Judge _2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.