United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2024

Mohr v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Mohr v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided December 17, 2024
Mohr v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Jennifer Mohr, No. CV-23-00535-TUC-SHR 10 Plaintiff, Order Adopting Report & Recommendation v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

On November 1, 2024, Magistrate Judge Lynnette C. Kimmins issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in which she recommended the Court affirm the Commissioner of Social Security's decision. (Doc. 26.) The R&R notified the parties they had fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R to file any objections. (Id. at 7.) No objections have been filed.

If neither party objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the District Court is not required to review the magistrate judge's decision under any specified standard of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (noting a district court need only review a magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made). However, the statute for review of a magistrate judge's recommendation "does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard." Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154.

1 In this case, the deadline for filing objections has passed. As noted, no objections 2|| have been filed, and neither party has requested additional time to do so despite the warning from Judge Kimmins indicating "[i]f objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived." (Doc. 26 at 7.) Therefore, the Court will adopt the R&R on that basis alone. See Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (declining to 6|| substantively review the magistrate judge's report and recommendation because no objections were filed).

8 Accordingly, 9 IT IS ORDERED Magistrate Judge Kimmins' Report and Recommendation (Doc.

26) is ADOPTED.

11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Commissioner of Social Security's decision is AFFIRMED.

13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

IS Dated this 17th day of December, 2024.

16 ‘ 18 Honorable Scott H. Rash 19 _/ United States District Judge _2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.