United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2024

Whaleco Incorporated v. Temu-dl.com

Whaleco Incorporated v. Temu-dl.com
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided January 10, 2024
Whaleco Incorporated v. Temu-dl.com

Trial Court Opinion

1 WO 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Whaleco Incorporated, No. CV-23-02606-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. Temu-dl.com, et al., 13 Defendants.

15 On December 15, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) in significant part and set a preliminary injunction (“PI”) hearing for December 29, 2023. (Doc. 13, 14.) At Plaintiff’s request, the Court later issued an order extending the TRO for 14 days and resetting the PI hearing for January 11, 2023. (Doc. 18.) The Court also set a deadline of January 4, 2023, for Defendant to appear and file an opposition to Plaintiff’s PI request. (Id.) 21 That deadline has now expired, yet Defendant has not appeared or filed the required opposition. Under LRCiv 7.2(i), this means the Court may treat the PI motion as unopposed and summarily grant it on that basis. See, e.g., Whaleco Incorporated v. dltemuapp.com, 2023 WL 7413670, *4 (D. Ariz. 2023) (“If Defendants do not respond to the Motion for a TRO/Preliminary Injunction or fail to appear at the above-scheduled [preliminary injunction] hearing, the Court will deem such failure as consent to granting the motion, see LRCiv 7.2(i).”); Henderson v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, 2010 WL 28 1962530, *6 (D. Ariz. 2010) (“[B]ecause there is not a timely response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, the Court finds such a failure as consent to || the granting of the motion under LRCiv. 7.2(i).”).

3 Accordingly, 4 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 5) is || granted to the extent it seeks the same relief set forth in the TRO.

6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the TRO (Doc. 14) is converted to a preliminary injunction and shall remain in effect during the pendency of this case, unless otherwise || ordered.

9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the preliminary injunction hearing set for January 11, 2023 is vacated.

11 Dated this 10th day of January, 2024.

13 Lom ee” 14 f □□ □□ Dominic W. Lanza 15 United States District Judge _2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.