Thigpen v. Heisner

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Antonio Thigpen, No. CV-23-01359-PHX-ROS 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. Unknown Heisner, 13 Defendant.

15 Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the Court deny Petitioner Antonio Thigpen’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Neither party filed objections. Therefore, the Court will adopt the R&R in full.1 A certificate of appealability is not required. Forde v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 114 F.3d 878, 879 (9th Cir. 1997).

20 Accordingly, 21 IT IS ORDERED the R&R (Doc. 10) is ADOPTED.

22 … … … … … Petitioner was informed he was required to keep his address updated. (Doc. 3 at 2).

28 Petitioner failed to do so. (Doc. 11). It is not clear whether Petitioner received a copy of the R&R. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the petition (Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed and 2|| the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant.

3 Dated this 19th day of April, 2024.

4 fo _ 5 — .

7 Senior United States District Judge _2-