Schermerhorn v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

1 WO 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Kelli Schermerhorn, No. CV-24-01672-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

15 The parties have filed a Joint Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) (Doc. 14). Plaintiff, through counsel, seeks $4,011.77 in attorney fees. (Id. at 1).

18 In any action brought by or against the United States except one sounding in tort, the EAJA provides that “a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses in addition to any costs . . . unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A); Tobeler v. Colvin, 749 F.3d 830, 832 (9th Cir. 2014). Under the EAJA, “attorneys’ fees are to be awarded to a party winning a . . . remand unless the Commissioner shows that his position with respect to the issue on which the district court based its remand was “substantially justified.” Lewis v. Barnhart, 281 F.3d 1081, 1083 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Flores v. Shalala, 49 F.3d 562, 568–69 (9th Cir. 1995)). Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 27 U.S. 586, 595–98 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by the Court belong to Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B)).

1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation for Attorney Fees Under the Equal 3|| Access to Justice Act (Doc. 14) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $4,011.77 in attorney fees. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiff's counsel: Kathryn □□ Dicus; Dicus Disability LLC; 10645 N Tatum Blvd., Ste. 329; Phoenix, AZ 85028.

6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, after receiving this Order, the || Commissioner: (1) determines upon effectuation of this Order that Plaintiff does not owe || debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, and (2) agrees to waive 9|| the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3727(b), the fees will be made || payable to Plaintiff's attorney. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury |} Offset Program, the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff's attorney.

13 Dated this 13th day of January, 2025.

15 (pe Gum SZ 16 norable'DiangJ4. Humetewa 17 United States District Judge _2-