United States District Court for the District of Arizona, 2025

Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
United States District Court for the District of Arizona · Decided March 13, 2025
Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA || Clarissa Connolly, ) No. CV 23-526-TUC-JAS (LCK) 6 Plaintiff, ORDER | Vs. Commissioner of Social Security, ) ° Defendant.

10 ) OO 12 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States || Magistrate Judge Kimmins. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any || objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired.

15 || As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed || the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ recommendations are not clearly || erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., | 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. | 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins || Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) is accepted and adopted. (2) This case is remanded || back to the ALJ for a new hearing and further proceedings as discussed in the Report and || Recommendation. (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case.

23 || Dated this 13th day of March, 2025.

26 _\ C. Ast > 27 Honorable James A. Soto 28 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.