Bazzill 349826 v. McGrane

WO 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9 Ryan Eugene Bazzill, No. CV-25-08022-PCT-KML (MTM) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 Vv.

Dennis McGrane, et al., 13 Defendants.

15 On March 18, 2025, the court ruled the complaint in this case was duplicative of a || complaint plaintiff filed in CV-24-8165. (Doc. 6 at 4.) This case was dismissed on that || basis. Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, but that motion does not address the basis for the court’s dismissal. (Doc. 8.) Reconsideration is not merited. See Zimmerman v. City || of Oakland, 255 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2001) (discussing factors for granting a motion for || reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)).

Accordingly, 2 IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 8) is DENIED.

23 Dated this 27th day of March, 2025.

CU da MA 07 United States District Judge