Carney v. Maricopa, County of

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9 Ronald Carney, No. CV-22-01268-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 Vv.

12) County of Maricopa, et al., 13 Defendants.

15 United States Magistrate Judge Eileen Willett has issued a report and || recommendations (“R&R”) (Doc. 26) recommending that the case be dismissed without || prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had || fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 3) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of || Civil Procedure) No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to || review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 || U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). || Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with the analysis of || Magistrate Judge Willett. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R. 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of || Magistrate Judge Willett (Docs. 26) is accepted.

6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case without prejudice. The Clerk || of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case.

28 Dated this 23rd day of April, 2025.

SSE