Jackson v. Phoenix, City of

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9 Aaron Jackson, No. CV-25-01032-PHX-SMB (ASB) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 Vv.

12) City of Phoenix, et al., 13 Defendants.

15 United States Magistrate Judge Alison Bachus has issued a Report and || Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 20) recommending that Defendant Unknown Officer #1 || be dismissed for failure to serve pursuant to Rule 4(m). The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 4) (citing Rule || 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court || of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); || Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, □□ 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with || the analysis of Magistrate Judge Bachus. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R. 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of || Magistrate Judge Bachus (Docs. 20) is accepted.

6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing Defendant Unknown Officer #1.

Dated this 22nd day of September, 2025.

28 Le - « > United States District Judge