Reza Amiri v. Chris Howard, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
1 WO 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 Reza Amiri, No. CV-25-04797-PHX-KML (DMF) 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. Chris Howard, et al., 13 Respondents.
15 Petitioner filed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his immigration detention. (Doc. 1.) Petitioner alleges he has a final order of removal but was granted withholding of removal to Afghanistan. He was released on an order of supervision on July 1, 2024, but redetained without notice on December 6, 2025. Petitioner further alleges respondents have not provided notice of the reasons for the revocation of his release or complied with the applicable regulations regarding revoking Orders of Supervision, 8 21 C.F.R. § 241.4(l)(1)-(2) and 8 C.F.R. § 241.13(i). Petitioner contends his removal is not substantially likely to occur in the reasonably foreseeable future and, as a result, his detention is impermissible. See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 689 (holding that 8 24 U.S.C. § 1231 “does not permit indefinite detention”).
25 Respondents must show cause why the petition should not be granted. Respondents may limit their response to petitioner’s argument regarding the alleged noncompliance with the regulations regarding revoking Orders of Supervision.1 1 Petitioner also filed a motion for temporary restraining order. (Doc. 2.) Ordering an expedited response to this order to show cause renders moot the motion for temporary 1 IT IS ORDERED: 2 (1) | Counsel for Petitioner must immediately serve the Petition (Doc. 1) upon || Respondents.
4 (2) — If not already issued, the Clerk’s Office must issue any properly completed || summonses.
6 (3) The Clerk of Court must immediately transmit by email a copy of this Order || and the Petition to the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, to the attention 8|| of Katherine Branch [email protected], Melissa Kroeger at 9|| [email protected], Lon Leavitt at [email protected], and Theo Nickerson at || Theo.Nickerson2 @usdoj.gov.
11 (4) Respondents must show cause no later than January 16, 2026, why the || Petition should not be granted. Petitioner may file a reply no later than January 20, 2026.
13 (5) | The motion for temporary restraining order (Doc. 2) is denied.
14 Dated this 13th day of January, 2026.
17 □□ LA Woe Cet Honorable Krissa M. Lanham 18 United States District Judge restraining order.
_2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.