Robert Mendoza v. NaphCare, et al.

WO 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9|| Robert Mendoza, No. CV-25-00417-PHX-KML 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 V. 12) NaphCare, et al., 13 Defendants.

15 On March 10, 2026, Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf issued a Report and || Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice.

17|| (Doc. 20.) The time for objections has expired and none were filed. The R&R is adopted.

18 || See Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“[D]istrict courts || are not required to conduct any review at all. . . of any issue that is not the subject of an || objection.”).

71 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED. This || case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment || and close this case.

24 Dated this 17th day of April, 2026.

28 United States District Judge