Smith v. King of Arizona Mining & Milling Co.

Arizona Supreme Court
Smith v. King of Arizona Mining & Milling Co., 12 Ariz. 423 (Ariz. 1909)
100 P. 1134; 1909 Ariz. LEXIS 112
Doan, Kent, Nave, Sloan

Smith v. King of Arizona Mining & Milling Co.

Opinion of the Court

NAVE, J. —

The district court sustained a plea of res adju-dicata presented by defendants as a defense to plaintiffs’ complaint, and rendered judgment accordingly. From this judgment plaintiffs have appealed. Error is predicated upon the contention that the records presented in evidence in support -of the plea fail to sustain it. It would not serve a useful purpose to review the involved details of the former litigation so presented. The law as applied has no novel or unusual features. The district court was clearly correct in its ruling. The judgment is affirmed.

KENT, C. J., and SLOAN and DOAN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
C. ELMER SMITH and S. FAHS SMITH, Executors of the Estate of BEAUCHAMP H. SMITH, and v. THE KING OF ARIZONA MINING AND MILLING COMPANY, THE KING OF ARIZONA COMPANY, EPES RANDOLPH, E. S. IVES, HIRAM W. BLAISDELL, JOHN H. MARTIN, and S. FAHS SMITH, and
Status
Published