Santa Cruz County v. Earhart
Santa Cruz County v. Earhart
Opinion of the Court
Appellee served appellant county as its treasurer during the years 1915 and 1916. He was paid an annual
•The answer did not interpose the plea of the one-year statute of limitations, and, as a consequence, we have nothing to do but affirm the judgment. Chapter 80, Laws of 1917, did not take effect until a long time after this action was commenced. Santa Cruz County v. McKnight, ante, p. 103, 177 Pac. 256, just decided; Yuma County v. Hodges, post, p. 142, 177 Pac. 270, just decided.
CUNNINGHAM, C. J., and JOHN WILSON ROSS, J., concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA v. RAYMOND R. EARHART
- Status
- Published