Bouldin v. Sheerer

Arizona Supreme Court
Bouldin v. Sheerer, 21 Ariz. 247 (Ariz. 1920)
187 P. 568; 1920 Ariz. LEXIS 99

Bouldin v. Sheerer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

No assignments of error have been filed by appellant or appear in the briefs filed. We have decided in a long line of cases that, in the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the appeal may be either dismissed or the judgment affirmed. Maricopa County v. Jordan, 7 Ariz. 4, 60 Pac. 693; Gardner v. Gardner, 7 Ariz. 73, 60 Pac. 875; Trimble et al. v. Long, 6 Ariz. 268, 56 Pac. 731; Daggs et al. v. Field, 6 Ariz. 47, 52 Pac. 773; Daggs et al. v. Hoskins et al., 5 Ariz. 236, 52 Pac. 350; Putnam v. Putnam, 3 Ariz. 182, 24 Pac. 320.; Wolfley v. Gila River Irr. Co., 3 Ariz. 176, 24 Pac. 257.

*248The members of the bar of the state must take notice that this salutary rule will hereafter be strictly enforced. '

The appeal in this case is dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
EVA SHEERER BOULDIN v. GEORGE W. SHEERER, in His Own Right and as Guardian for PEARL SHEERER, a Minor Child, ELLA SHEERER and ANNA HIRST, Probation Officer of Cochise County, Arizona
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published