City of Phoenix v. Price

Arizona Supreme Court
City of Phoenix v. Price, 54 Ariz. 98 (Ariz. 1939)
Lockwood, McAlistee

City of Phoenix v. Price

Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, J.

— It has been stipulated between the parties in the above-entitled action that the issues of law involved in the case of City of Phoenix, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. R. F. Kidd, Appellee, ante, p. 75, 92 Pac. (2d) 513, just decided, are the *99same as those in the present case, and that the decision of the conrt therein should be decisive also of this appeal.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the superior court be reversed, and the case remanded with instructions to enter judgment for defendant.

ROSS, C. J., concurs.

Dissenting Opinion

McALISTEE, J.,

Dissenting. — I am unable to concur in the disposition of this cause for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in City of Phoenix, a Municipal Corporation v. Kidd, ante, p. 75, 92 Pac. (2d) 513, just decided.

Reference

Full Case Name
CITY OF PHOENIX, a Municipal Corporation v. R. D. PRICE
Status
Published