Arizona Supreme Court, 1967

Stines v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1967 · Per Curiam

424 P.2d 153; 102 Ariz. 25; 1967 Ariz. LEXIS 189 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Camelback Contractors, Inc. v. Industrial Commission (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980)
Fleitz v. Van Westrienen (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977)
City of Scottsdale v. Kokaska (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is ordered denied. The asserted impeaching evidence having been deposited with the clerk of the court in compliance with Rule XVI(c) (1) (vii), Uniform Rules of Practice, as amended February 1st, 1967, 17 A.R. S., the trial judge should examine such evidence for the purpose of determining whether it is for impeachment purposes, in accordance with our decision in Zimmerman v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa County, 98 Ariz. 85, 402 P.2d 212.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.