Arizona Supreme Court, 1979

Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1

Arizona Supreme Court · Decided May 9, 1979 · Cameron, Hays, Holohan, Struckmeyer

122 Ariz. 377; 595 P.2d 169; 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 286

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Garza v. Swift Transportation Co. (Ariz. 2009)
Jared P. v. Glade T. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009)
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Dougherty (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000)
Dayton Women's Health Center v. Enix (Ohio 1990)
In re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-8545 (Ariz. 1984)
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933 (Ariz. 1982)
Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D. (Ariz. 1981)
Amato v. General Motors Corp. (Ohio 1981)
Hanania v. City of Tucson (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

The petition for review is granted. The decision of the Court of Appeals in Eaton v. *378Unified School District No. 1 of Pima County, Arizona et al., 122 Ariz. 391, 595 P.2d 183 (App. 1979), is approved and adopted as the opinion of this court. We note that Division Two of the Court of Appeals has overruled Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Pleasants, 23 Ariz.App. 467, 534 P.2d 275 (1975), the case which was in conflict with Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1, supra, and originally occasioned our granting of the petition for review. See Hanania v. City of Tucson, 123 Ariz. -, 597 P.2d 190 (App. 1979).

CAMERON, C. J., STRUCKMEYER, V. C. J., and HOLOHAN, J., concur.

Note: Justice FRANK X. GORDON, Jr., did not participate in the determination of this matter.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.